Peer Review Process

The peer review of scientific manuscripts is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine. Peer reviewed journals rely on expert and objective review by knowledgeable researchers to ensure the quality of the papers they publish. The collective activities of the investigators who review manuscripts in a scientific discipline are critical to maintaining the standards of the journals and the field. To be a good reviewer, one must understand the peer review process and the role of the reviewer. JAMDSR conveys heartfelt thanks to all the reviewers who have done critical analysis of all the articles published in journal. Journal follows the double blinded peer review to evaluate the articles submitted to journals.

Journal staff - oversees the receipt of manuscripts, manages communications with authors and reviewers and processes accepted manuscripts for publication

Members of the editorial board - read and review papers, select reviewers and monitor quality of reviews, and recommend actions to editor

Reviewers - provide reviews of manuscripts, make recommendations concerning publication

Scientific editors - make the final decision as to whether a specific manuscript will be accepted for publication, returned for revisions, or rejected


Download reviewer's guidelines

IJRHAS will be pleased to accept services of experts in various fields as referees. Please feel free to contact at