Background: This study was conducted to assess the comparison of implant-supported overdentures and conventional overdentures. Material and methods: The trial involved 100 participants, of whom 50 received a mandibular overdenture supported by implants, whereas 50 received a typical mandibular denture in place of a conventional maxillary full denture. There were no restrictions on the implant type, the quantity of implants, or the loading technique. Furthermore, there were no limitations on how and when to evaluate post-treatment satisfaction. Results: In order to assess the primary outcome and secondary outcomes, information from 100 individuals, including 50 who received implants and 50 who received traditional treatment, was evaluated. The analysis's findings revealed a mean difference of -35.64 for the overall score, -29.45 for functional limitation, -33.64 for physical pain, -82.14 for psychological discomfort, -31.45 for physical disability, -53.77 for psychological disability, -14.23 for social disability, and -25.11 for handicap, all of which were statistically significant in favour of the implant group, with the exception of physical pain. Conclusion: In conclusion, based on the data analyzed, implant-supported overdentures are superior to traditional dentures at improving several facets of individuals who have lost all of their teeth's quality of life. Keywords: implant, overdenture, conventional