Background: The research had been carried out to evaluate the prevalence of class II malocclusion in a known population and its treatment using myofunctional appliances.Material and methods: This research aimed to evaluate the prevalence of class II malocclusion within a specific population and to explore its treatment through the use of myofunctional appliances. A total of 125 individuals participated in the study, all of whom underwent a comprehensive oral clinical examination. Prior to the examination, the participants were informed about the study procedures and were requested to provide written informed consent. Out of the 125 participants, 25 declined to give consent, resulting in their exclusion from the study. The prevalence of class II malocclusion was determined among the remaining 100 subjects, and the results were systematically recorded. Additionally, a treatment plan was developed for those diagnosed with class II malocclusion. Various myofunctional appliances were designed and provided to the patients. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing SPSS software. Results: In this study, there were 100 subjects out of which 63 were male and 37 were female. Class II malocclusion was present in 30 subjects out of 100. Hence, the prevalence of class II malocclusion in this study was 30%. Twin block appliance was given in 10 subjects, Jasper Jumper appliance was given in 5 subjects, Herbst appliance was fabricated for 5 subjects, activator was given in 6 patients and Frankel II appliances were given in 4 patients. Conclusion: The study revealed that the prevalence of class II malocclusion was 32%. The most frequently utilized appliance among the patients was the activator, with the Twin Block appliance and Jasper Jumper appliance following in usage. Additionally, the Herbst appliance and Frankel II appliance were also employed. Keywords: Class II Malocclusion, Prevalence, Treatment.